tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post4340163940103394878..comments2024-01-31T03:00:37.150-05:00Comments on View-from-Wilmington: A reconsideration of the DNA forensics in the Duke lacrosse caseChris Halkideshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14933976220776524122noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-54626479715492622292020-10-13T06:38:59.122-04:002020-10-13T06:38:59.122-04:00Thanks for sharing this good post!Thanks for sharing this good post!faceitdnahttps://faceitdna.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-87198530790281786372015-10-19T05:27:55.350-04:002015-10-19T05:27:55.350-04:00Thanks for sharing this good post!Thanks for sharing this good post!biomarker assay http://www.creativebiomart.net/Biomarker-Service.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-3596762255668271522015-05-18T21:29:05.810-04:002015-05-18T21:29:05.810-04:00I added an update covering Brad Bannon's comme...I added an update covering Brad Bannon's comments about how he defends against a DNA-based case.Chris Halkideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14933976220776524122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-82456663771014595112015-04-02T12:53:53.753-04:002015-04-02T12:53:53.753-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-45403310934078699862015-02-11T20:09:02.103-05:002015-02-11T20:09:02.103-05:00The topic of this blog entry is the DNA evidence i...The topic of this blog entry is the DNA evidence in the Duke lacrosse case. Please stay on topic, or your comments may be deleted.Chris Halkideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14933976220776524122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-8877538348210458962015-02-11T19:57:46.088-05:002015-02-11T19:57:46.088-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-31373633296658843762015-02-09T08:16:04.218-05:002015-02-09T08:16:04.218-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-88240747382551147612015-02-09T06:51:47.590-05:002015-02-09T06:51:47.590-05:00Please stay on topic and be civil to one another. ...Please stay on topic and be civil to one another. If you lie about or misrepresent the comments of other commenters or the host, your comment may be deleted.Chris Halkideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14933976220776524122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-55797427423326175152015-02-09T06:47:06.756-05:002015-02-09T06:47:06.756-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-87619491290161510622014-12-16T13:28:45.389-05:002014-12-16T13:28:45.389-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13175545611928369253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-60224523038546132972014-12-16T10:03:13.013-05:002014-12-16T10:03:13.013-05:00Rose,
As usual, you have hit the nail on the head...Rose,<br /><br />As usual, you have hit the nail on the head; I agree that there seems to be an agenda. If the circumstances were different, I might excuse some ignorance of the strengths and limitations of DNA evidence. Cohan uses the DNA on the fingernails to club Mr. Evans. Likewise, he uses the Georgetown incidient to club Mr. Finnerty. In neither case does he get the story correct.Chris Halkideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14933976220776524122noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8731849270338485723.post-6229483542342725102014-12-16T03:43:26.376-05:002014-12-16T03:43:26.376-05:00Thanks Chris. It's hard for me to believe that...Thanks Chris. It's hard for me to believe that after all this time somebody seems to want to cast doubt on the serious nature of the prosecutorial misconduct in this case. Nifong wanted to win an election and Meehan wanted to make Nifong happy for business reasons. I suspect Cohan's POV is agenda driven as well. There is a lot of value in DNA evidence but this case and many others show that it is possible to present that evidence in a way that fits an agenda.Rose Montaguehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13500975853140673897noreply@blogger.com